In conclusion, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is a solid all-round tyre, showing high performance in most aspects but does have a noted drawback in terms of rolling resistance. On the other hand, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 consistently performs at the top of the majority of tests, especially shining in snow performance and dry braking.
Charakterystyka Na suchej nawierzchni Hamowanie na suchej nawierzchni 83.6% Handling na suchej nawierzchni 88.9% Komfort akustyczny 92.4% Na mokrej nawierzchni Odporność na aquaplaning 86.9% Hamowanie na mokro 85% Handling na mokrej nawierzchni 77.8% Koszty
The Hankook ended up sixth in Sweden, some two per cent behind the Michelin that it ran so close in Finland last year. The balance was good on snow, with enough rear movement to rotate the car,
Is there a big difference between them? We'll try to find the answer. The Michelin has a newer model. Check out Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 comparing. Main information Comparison in tests We analyzed tests in which both tires competed with each other. They were taken in the same size and installed on the same car.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2: Comparison and Final Analysis. In comparing the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 and the Michelin CrossClimate 2, it's clear that both tires offer outstanding performance and versatility. The Kinergy 4S2 provides reliable traction, durability, and fuel efficiency at a more budget-friendly price.
. 28 509 235 218 679 497 528 448
hankook kinergy 4s vs michelin crossclimate
